SAI Global GRC Community

GRC COMMUNITY
Building Organizational Integrity.
Blogs >> Compliance & Ethics Risk Management >> Choosing SOX over Dodd-Frank?

30
Dec
2010

Choosing SOX over Dodd-Frank?


If you thought that Sarbanes-Oxley was bad - brace yourself for Dodd-Frank. Compare 66 pages to 2300+ pages - with hundreds of rule-making initiatives for various federal agencies, new and old. Corporate directors will, once again, be diverted from their key oversight role with a barrage of "best practices," most notably in the area of executive compensation. Rulemaking will reveal the haste with which Dodd-Frank was cobbled together as well as its ambiguities.

If you think that I'm exaggerating, for a great example of the law of unintended consequences, read the Current Report on Form 8-K of Newmont Mining Corporation filed on September 1, 2010 (found at http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1164727/000095012310083116/c05590e8vk.htm), which reads, in part: "Section 1503(b)(1) of the [Dodd-Frank] Act requires a Current Report on Form 8-K if a company is issued an imminent danger order under … the Federal Mine Safety … Act … by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration. On August 28, 2010, Newmont … received an Order stating that an employee … was observed accessing a piece of mine equipment while carrying a lunch box. The employee attached the box to his body without incident, which immediately terminated the Order."

Again - brace yourself.

Gary Brown

Gary M. Brown is the Chair of the Corporate Department (which includes securities and mergers and acquisitions) of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC. Mr. Brown's practice centers on advising public companies and their officers and directors on corporate governance, securities and other compliance issues.

Login to post comments

© 2013 SAI Global Limited ABN 67 050 611 642

Login

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel